(A new major challenge to the veracity of the NIST WTC 7 report, spearheaded by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.)
Excerpt from introduction:
This petition is a request for correction of information disseminated by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”). This Request for Correction (the “Request”) is being submitted by 10 family members of people killed on September 11, 2001, by 88 architects and structural engineers, and by the organization Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Inc. (referred to herein collectively as “Requesters”). It is being submitted under Section 515 of Public Law 106-554 (commonly known as the Data Quality Act or Information Quality Act; herein referred to as the “DQA”), the Office of Management and Budget’s (“OMB’s”) government-wide Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizing the Quality, Objectivity, Utility, and Integrity of Information Disseminated by Federal Agencies (the “OMB Guidelines”), and NIST’s “Guidelines, Information Quality Standards, and Administrative Mechanism” (the “NIST IQS”).
Two members of Scientists for 9/11 Truth made substantive contributions to this effort: David Chandler contributed an analysis of the freefall descent of the building and André Rousseau contributed a section on the seismic signals associated with the collapse of the building. [If I’m overlooking the contributions of others, please let me know.] The section on freefall contains new research, tracking both visible corners of the building plus a point near NIST’s tracking point to come up with a clearer understanding of the exact nature of NIST’s deception.
Main Document: Request for Correction (RFC)
Exhibit B: Declaration of André Rousseau regarding the seismic signals associated with the building collapse.
Exhibit B1: André Rousseau, CV
Exhibit D: Expansion of Beam K3004 vs Temperature